Contemporary Witnesses

Moritz Wilhelm of Saxe-Zeitz

Moritz Wilhelm
Duke of Saxe-Zeitz (1664-1718)


 When Bessler stayed in Draschwitz (near Zeitz), Moritz Wilhelm soon became aware of him, because the municipality was part of his duchy. The news of the “Perpetuum Mobile” quickly got around. It is recorded in the "Courtly Journal" that Moritz Wilhelm was in Draschwitz on the 14th July 1714 in order pay a visit to Bessler and have a look at his invention. 

Bessler, who had found accommodation in a manor, readily presented his new wheel. The Duke was impressed and felt much pride that this unusual machine had been developed on his territory of all places. Full of admiration, he now ensured that the wheel became known in educated circles of society. A few days later, he informed the mathematician Leibniz. 

Moritz Wilhelm is sometimes confused with the Duke of the same name of Saxe-Merseburg. (See below.) 

Leibniz

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716), mathematician and philosopher


He is the most prominent contemporary witness. He is above all doubts and, as the inventor of a mechanical calculating machine, was  

specialist enough to rule out a fraud. From the 22nd October to the 23rd, at the invitation of Duke Moritz Wilhelm of Saxe-Zeitz, he spent some time in the residential palace, and in November 1714, made a visit to Bessler in nearby Draschwitz from there. Initially quite skeptical, he was amazed that this wheel kept on spinning at constant speed in his presence. Leibniz was so impressed that he informed, among others, Landgrave Karl of Hesse-Cassel about the wheel. Upon invitation from Karl, Bessler moved to Cassel in 1716 and built a new wheel there, which completed a 54-day permanent test at Weissenstein Castle. 

Moritzburg

The Moritzburg in Zeitz, on the left the cathedral, in the background the castle.


By invitation of Duke Moritz Wilhelm, Leibniz stayed here several times. Also in autumn 1714, among other things, to visit Bessler's wheel in nearby Draschwitz.
 
Leibniz reported: “Orffyreus belongs to my friends. He allowed me to conduct various experiments with his machine some time ago. During my presence, it ran continuously for 2 hours and demonstrated considerable force. This machine is very special, and we should not overlook the fact that it can be put to good use.”

He had in mind, particularly, the drainage of mines. At that time, inundated tunnels were an almost unsolvable problem. Since the steam engine and the electric motor were not yet invented, in principle only the muscle power of humans or animals were available to run the pumps. One had windmills, but they depended on the presence of wind and of course had to be set up above ground. This resulted in the necessity of vertical power transmission over longer distances. Something that the technology at that time could only accomplish with considerable difficulties and losses. Bessler's wheel, on the other hand, would have worked underground.  

Leibniz was, by the way, not the kind of person to sit in his ivory tower and lose connection to the world. Quite the contrary, he had strong practical talents. For example, the first mechanical calculating machine, which mastered all four basic calculations, can be traced back to him. Multiplication worked on the basis of repeated addition and division was carried out by repeated subtraction. The mechanics for this were quite complex. Leibniz thus had a good comprehension of the materials, tools and activities of a contemporary mechanical engineer. 

Johann Andreas Weiße, District Magistrate in Merseburg

At the public examination of Merseburg in 1715, Weiße had been commissioned (apparently independently of the commission) by Duke Moritz Wilhelm to write a protocol. This record has been preserved for posterity and is kept in the archives of the University Library of Kassel. The formulations are very stilted and were certainly the forerunners of today's officialese German. They were “translated” by the author (Volker Keller) into the present language. Some incomprehensible phrases were omitted. 

“I, Johann Andreas Weiße, currently appointed bailiff, have produced this certificate and confirm the following: I received the order to go to the so-called Green Court alongside the local state-court people, in order to attend today's examination of the Perpetuum Mobile invented by Mr. Orffyreo, and take precise written notes of all dealings and experiments. So I attended the examination in the presence of many famous scientists and other noble persons from beginning to end. 

After the inventor had led us around and clearly showed us that his Perpetuum Mobile could not be driven anywhere in a hidden way, he set it, about 6 cubits in diameter and a shoe wide, in motion. This was completed with little strength and only until the first weight inside had fallen down. After that, it set itself in motion violently and turned 40 times and more per minute. Only with great strength could it be stopped again. He let it run to the left and right several times, and then attached a rope to the axle shaft, which he led out of the window. This cord held a box full of bricks, weighing about 70 pounds, which was pulled up several times and let down again. Then the inventor moved his machine to a rack, in the presence of all the spectators, and had the axle cones thoroughly examined by the Commissioners appointed for this purpose, as well as by me and the court persons. During this visit, not the slightest irregularity could be determined. He then put his machine back into rapid movement with the already described equally low effort, this fact was admiringly noted by the scientists present and the other onlookers and expressly confirmed. Thus, the invention was completely released from any suspicion or doubt. Upon request, this fact is expressly certified by the stamped Princely Saxon Official Seal and by my own signature as a bailiff. 
Such witnessed at Merseburg, the 31. October 1715.” 

Note: 
The Duden Dictionary no longer contains the term “court person”, but it is still used in Austria and German-speaking Switzerland and designates the member of a court (judge, jury, etc.). What was understood at the time is unclear. Moritz had probably commissioned members of Merseburg jurisdiction to attend the demonstration as well, in order to clearly demonstrate the impartiality of the review. 

Bessler's Wheel

The rope leading out of the window and the wooden box hanging on it are part of the woodcut visible on our start page. For this purpose, a rope pulley was attached to a rafter in the Green Court in Merseburg. According to the witnesses, the other end of the rope was wrapped directly around the axis of the wheel. The angle of the rope is not reproduced correctly due to the fact that the wheel of the start page is part of a larger woodcut, on which it is displayed a second time in side view (see the red colouring in the diagram). After redirection via a roll attached to the ground, the rope wraps around the axis of this side view.

The side view shown on the left part also contains the stamp mill, which is described under the name “pounding pillars” in the following report by Gottfried Teuber. The woodcut is therefore not a pictorial documentation of the wheel that was tested in Merseburg. The same applies to the pendulums, which are not mentioned in a single witness report. It may have been a Bessler gimmick, or they were added in artistic liberty. Later it was occasionally claimed that the pendulums had served to balance the wheel or guarantee a smooth run. However, neither makes much sense. A disturbing imbalance could have been eliminated much easier with additional, permanently arranged masses. Since a lower speed was recorded under load, the pendulum would have hindered the process as a separate vibratory system. This is addressed In the article “Speculation”

Herder Gymnasium

Today, the “Green Court” no longer exists. It was completely demolished in the 70s of the 20th century as part of the city renewal. In its place is the Herder-Gymnasium depicted above. For admirers of Bessler, it is, however, a memorable place. After all, due to the test in 1715, his invention went down in history as the “Merseburg wheel”. 

Merseburg is a charming city. If you visit Halle an der Saale as a tourist, you should definitely have enough time to pay a visit to the cathedral town of Merseburg, which is just a short distance away to the south. Merseburg is the city of magical spells. The history of the cathedral also includes the raven tale, which goes back to Bishop Thilo von Trotha. 

Green Court (Gruener Hof)

The “Green Court”, mentioned in the report of Bailiff Weiße, was the place where the inspection was carried out. It was a complex of buildings located near the Sixti Church at Leunaer Straße 6. It was built in the 17th century and was a large plot with a residential building, outbuildings, barns, stables etc. Above is a drawing from the “Merseburger Kreiskalender” from 1940. It was kindly made available by the Historical Municipal Archive Merseburg. It says there:
“In front of the Sixti gate, opposite the city cemetery, there has been a “Green Court” since the old days. This property is already mentioned in medieval times. A citizen of our city, Johannes Andreas, sold it to the Sixti-Foundation in 1350 together with the adjacent “Great Court”. Of course, there were not yet the different buildings we see today. They are even missing from the views of the city of Merseburg, drawn by Dilich around 1630 and by Merian, around 1650. We only hear more about the “Green Court” in the second half of the 17th century. During this time, Günther von Grießheim built the house (and probably also the outbuildings). In the old fountain, the year 1668 is carved into a stone. The construction was probably built at that time. The Grießheims were a respected noble family in Merseburg during the time of the duchy.” 

Sixti Church

Here is a photo of the nearby Sixti Church. It was built in the 11th century, destroyed in the Thirty Years' War, and never rebuilt afterwards. In Bessler's time it was already a ruin. The tower has been used as a water reservoir since 1889. 

 Other contemporary witnesses: 

Gottfried Teuber (1656-1731), Court Deacon and Master in Zeitz 
 

”This is a hollow wooden wheel, 10 feet in diameter and 6 inches thick. It is covered by thin wooden boards that conceal the inner mechanism. The axle is also made of wood and protrudes one foot over the wheel on each side. The axle has teeth that move 3 wooden pounding pillars, similar to what is found in stamp mills. These pillars are quite heavy, and they are constantly lifted and dropped again. The iron axle cones turn within open bearings, so that any fraud using an external energy supply can be excluded. 

I had arranged a meeting with the inventor. As we approached the machine, I could see that the wheel was tied down with a thick rope. Once the rope was untied, the machine started to turn with great power. For a long time it neither accelerated nor slowed its pace. Great strength was required to stop it again.” 

Joseph Emanuel Fischer von Erlach (1693-1742), Austrian architect


”Although I am suspicious of things that I do not understand, I must assure you that I cannot see any reason why this machine should not bear the name “Perpetuum Mobile”. In any case, I have good reasons to believe that it was such a thing, because I was allowed to perform some experiments on it. It is a wheel with a diameter of about 12 feet, which is covered by an oilcloth. With each rotation of the wheel, 8 weights can supposedly be perceived, which fall down on the side to which the wheel is currently rotating. It turns at an amazing speed, about 26 revolutions per minute running idle. If the axle is connected to a rope and an Archimedian screw in order to pump water upwards, there remain 20 revolutions per minute. I checked this with my watch several times, and it was always the same result. I then stopped the wheel with great difficulty with both hands on its outer perimeter. Trying to stop it suddenly would lift a man off the ground. 

Once stopped in this fashion, it stood still. I then slowly set the wheel in motion again to see if it would return to its old speed independently. I doubted it, because I assumed that you had to give the wheel a high starting impulse. But to my astonishment it became faster and faster. After two revolutions it had reached its old pace again. It reached the previous 26 revolutions per minute idling and 20 revolutions when connected to the screw. 

This fact that the wheel accelerated from a very slow movement to fast rotation after a slight push convinces me more that it was a perpetual motion than if I had seen it in motion for a whole year. So instead of slowly reducing its speed by means of air resistance and friction, it became ever faster. I can't see how anyone should doubt this. Then I reversed the direction of rotation, and the wheel showed the same results. Then I checked the bearings to see if there were any oddities there. But I couldn’t find anything except the two small bearings where the wheel was suspended in its center.” 

Johann Christian Wolff

Johann Christian Wolff (1679-1754), Professor of Mathematics and Philosophy in Halle

Wolff wrote in a letter to Leibniz: “When Orffyreus exhibited his extraordinary machine to counter the vicious rumors of deception, I made a point of being present. Reality showed that his wheel is far from any deception. The investigation was carried out in the presence of the Duke's commissioners and other guests. When the machine was ready to be set in motion, all the adjacent rooms were opened and the cover of the bearings was completely removed. In order to prevent anyone from seeing the mechanism of his wheel by accident, Bessler covered it. While he did so, he made no secret of the fact that the machine was driven by weights. He had some of these weights wrapped in a cloth, and had us take them into our hands to guess their weight. Each weighed about 4 pounds and clearly had a cylindrical shape. 

I draw from it, but also from other circumstances, the conclusion that the weights were connected with movable or elastic arms at the outer edge of the wheel. While the wheel was spinning, it was clearly possible to hear the weights banging against wooden walls. Through a slot I could see these walls. They were slightly curved. When he took the wheel to another place and reinserted the weights, he pushed down an iron spring, which gave a loud noise on its subsequent return to the top.” 

Professor Christian Wolff was a member of the Royal Society from 1710 on, and had the same standing at the “Berliner Akademie der Wissenschaften” from 1711 onward. In other words, an intellectual heavyweight. 
 

Moritz Wilhelm von Sachsen-Merseburg

Moritz Wilhelm Duke of Saxe-Merseburg (1688 -1731)

After the early death of his father Christian II, he became the third Duke of Saxe-Merseburg at the age of 6 and ruled until 1731. Because of his love for music, he was later given the nickname “Violin-Duke”. His duchy included the offices of Merseburg, Delitzsch, Lauchstädt, Lützen and Schkeuditz. The area reached directly to the then city limits of Leipzig. Due to the later expansion of Leipzig, the former border town of Lindenau is now one of its districts.

Moritz Wilhelm is occasionally confused with the Duke of Saxe-Zeitz of the same name. The latter, however, came from another family and was 24 years older. He has already been reported on above.

Moritz Wilhelm was an educated man and was considered a kind sovereign. He was impressed by Bessler's invention. Because of the unsilenced charges of fraud, he arranged for a public audit in Merseburg on 31. October 1715. A commission was convened, consisting of respected personalities and famous experts. In addition to the above-mentioned Christian Wolff, the following five people mentioned were the best-known among the commissioners:
Friederich Hoffmann (1660 - 1742), medical professor and founder of the University of Halle
He developed the concept that the human body is a mechanical system that is in constant motion. Possibly an inspiration from the intensive preoccupation with Bessler's invention.
Johann Burkhard Mencke (1674 - 1732), professor of history at the University of Leipzig,
Christoph Semler (1669 - 1740), founder of the first German secondary school,
Christoph Buchta, advisor at the court of the Duke and friend of Leibniz,
Johann Adam Caff,
 master builder of Saxony-Weissenfels and Engineer

The report quoted in the biography from Zedler's historical universal dictionary on the “public test” of Merseburg contains the names of all the commission members. (See there.)  

Willem Jacob 'sGravesande

Willem Jacob 'sGravesande (1688-1742), Dutch mathematician

 'sGravesande was a professor at Leiden/Netherlands and a member of the Royal Society of London, of which Isaac Newton was the president. The first experimental detection of the expansion of heated metals is due to 'sGravesande. A London Interest Group (previously the Royal Society itself) commissioned him to make a visit to Bessler to inspect the wheel and to prepare for possible purchase negotiations. It is assumed that Newton was the actual initiator, but wanted to stay in the background. Newton himself, among other things, dealt with the laws of gravity and was certainly very interested in the workings of Bessler's wheel. A letter has been preserved, which 'sGravesande wrote to Isaac Newton on 7.8.1721:

” I thought, Sir, that you would not be displeased to have a rather detailed account of what can be seen from an external examination of a machine concerning which sentiments are so divided, and which is opposed by almost all the accomplished mathematicians. A majority maintain the impossibility of perpetual motion, whence comes the scant attention that has been paid to the machine of Orffyreus.

I know I am inferior to those who have given demonstrations of the impossibility of this motion, nevertheless to explain to you the sentiments with which I examined this machine, I have the honour to tell you that about seven years ago I believe I discovered the paralogism of these demonstrations, in that they could not be applicable to all possible machines; and since then I have always been convinced that one could demonstrate that perpetual motion was not contradictory; and it seemed to me that Mr. Leibnitz was wrong to regard as an axiom the impossibility of perpetual motion; which was nevertheless at the basis of part of his philosophy. Notwithstanding this conviction, I was very far from believing that Orffyreus was accomplished enough to discover perpetual motion. I considered that perpetual motion would not be discovered until after many other inventions, if ever. But since I have examined the machine, I don't know how to express my astonishment.

The inventor has a genius for mechanics, but is not in the least a profound mathematician, however that machine has something surprising about it, even if it be fraudulent. The following is about the machine itself, the interior of which the inventor will not permit to be seen, lest anyone should steal his secret from him.

It is a drum about 14 inches thick by 12 feet diameter; it is very light, being made of several wooden boards assembled with other pieces of wood, in such a way that the interior could be seen from all sides if not for an oilcloth which covers all of the drum. This drum is traversed by an axle of about six inches diameter, terminated at its ends by three-quarter inch iron journals, on which the machine turns. I examined these journals, and I am convinced that nothing from outside contributes to the movement of the machine.

I turned the drum very slowly, and it stood still as soon as I took my hand away; I made it make a turn or two in that way. Then I made it move slightly more quickly; again I made it make a turn or two; but then I was obliged to hold it back continually; for having let it go, it reached in less than two turns its maximum velocity, so that it made twenty-five or twenty-six turns per minute. It kept up this motion some time ago for two months in a sealed room, in which it was impossible that there could have been any fraud."

Landgrave Karl of Hesse-Cassel

Landgrave Karl of Hesse-Cassel (1654-1730)

Landgrave Karl was both an absolute ruler and enlightened sovereign. Under his reign, he introduced compulsory education and gave a large number of Huguenots a new home. As a patron of Johann Bessler, to whom he granted refuge at Weissenstein Castle in 1716, he was the only one who the inventor ever confided his secret to. Karl had immediately understood the principle upon looking closely and expressed his wonder that no one else had thought of this amazingly simple principle beforehand. Without ever revealing the secret entrusted to him, he is supposed to later have said that the interior of the wheel had only been a simple arrangement of levers and weights. 

From an authentic point of view, Karl is the most important witness, because he had the certainty that the wheel actually worked as it had always been propagated by his inventor. His desire to see the mechanism was probably less an expression of curiosity or sensationalism, it was probably the need to get a view of Bessler's trustworthiness. He would never have supported him for so many years if there had been any doubt. 

Weissenstein Castle

Drawing by Johann Heinrich Müntz (1727-1789). On the right side Weissenstein Castle, in the background the “Herkules” with the cascades built from 1701 onwards by Karl. The ridge was later renamed “Karlsberg”.

The name “Weissenstein” arose from a large bright rock, which already in the 12th century gave its name to the Weissenstein monastery, which was built at that time. This building was demolished in 1610 and replaced by Weissenstein Castle. At the time of Landgrave Karl it enjoyed great popularity, but from 1786 it had to give way to a new building again. The castle Wilhelmshöhe, which still exists today, was built. 

Wilhelmshoehe

Painting by Johann Erdmann Hummel (1798-1852).

It shows Wilhelmshöhe Castle, which now occupies the area of the demolished Weissenstein Castle. The position of the observer is a little further to the right compared to the last picture. Unmistakable in the background is the Hercules. The construction of the multi-part building was carried out at the time of Landgrave Wilhelm IX. (1743-1821). (Therefore the name of the new castle.) Napoleon III lived here in exile from 1870. It is said that this is the origin of the popularly saying: “Off with you to Kassel!” 

Some History:

Since Landgrave Karl played the most important role in Bessler's life, but today hardly anyone has any idea of what was connected with the name “Hesse-Cassel”, the interested reader can find out about the history of this duchy in the following text.

Cassel was the historical capital of Hesse since 1277. After the death of Landgrave Philip I, (“the magnanimous”), Hesse was divided among his four sons in 1567. The duchies of Hesse-Cassel, Hesse-Darmstadt, Hesse-Marburg and Hesse-Rheinfels were created. The last two were later divided among the first two, after there were no further descendants. Due to the division of Hesse-Marburg, there were disputes between Hesse-Cassel and Hesse-Darmstadt in 1604. The different religious denominations were the superficial trigger. While Hesse-Darmstadt sided with Luther, Hesse-Cassel decided to go for Calvinism. However, the deceased Landgrave Ludwig IV of Hesse-Marburg had made it a condition in his will that Marburg would have to remain Lutheran. Since Hesse-Cassel ignored this condition, Hesse-Darmstadt subsequently demanded the entire Marburg heritage. However, Hesse-Cassel did not follow this request and thus initiated an almost 50-year inheritance dispute, which even led to the so-called “Hesse War” in 1645 and onlywas over at the end of the Thirty Years' War (1648). Hesse-Darmstadt had not been able to enforce its claims militarily and finally gave up. Marburg, Kirchhain and Frankenberg stayed with Hesse-Cassel, Butzbach, Giessen, Grünberg and Alsfeld stayed with Hesse-Darmstadt.

A total of three Landgraves of Hesse-Cassel were involved in these inheritance disputes. Not Karl, however, because his reign started as the sixth after Philip I in 1670. Since he was not yet of age at this time, his mother ruled as his guardian for another five years. While his predecessors had been in office for an average of barely two decades, Karl ruled for 60 years. He had a particularly lasting impact on his country during this time. The fact that he held his protective hand over Bessler is just one of many examples of social commitment during his reign.

In 1803, Hesse-Cassel became an electorate of the “Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation”. The current Landgrave Wilhelm IX became Elector Wilhelm I. His country was now called “Kurfürstentum Hesse” or “Kurhesse” for short. 

By the decision of Napoleon, the Landgraviate of Hesse-Darmstadt became the “Great Duchy of Hesse” in 1806. At about the same time, the “Duchy of Nassau” was created from the Principalities of Nassau-Usingen and Nassau-Weilburg, whose border ran north of the Main, east of the Rhine, south of the Lahn and west in a line from Offenbach to Marburg. Nassau is an old German noble family, whose origins date back to the 10th century. Larger cities were Wiesbaden, Limburg and Weilburg. The “Great Duchy of Hesse”, (capital Darmstadt), was cut in half by Nassau and consisted of the provinces of Starkenburg (east of the Rhine between Main and Neckar) and Upper Hesse (Büdingen, Friedberg, Gießen, Grünberg, Alsfeld, Lauterbach). From 1816, the Rhine Hesse on the left bank of the Rhine with Bingen, Mainz, Alzey and Worms was still part of Darmstadt. So there were two Hesse. Kurhessen with the capital Cassel and the Grand Duchy of Hesse with the capital Darmstadt.

Not long after the Intermezzo of the Napoleonic occupation, Kurhessen was annexed by Prussia as a result of the Prussian-Austrian war in 1866. The same fate was suffered by the Duchy of Nassau and the Free Imperial City of Frankfurt am Main. Together they formed the new Prussian province of “Hesse-Nassau” with Cassel as the provincial capital. The Grand Duchy of Hesse, on the other hand, remained largely unaffected and only had to cede smaller areas to Prussia. In principle, this state of law continued until 1945. The renaming of Cassel coincides between the two world wars. In 1926, the “C” was replaced by a “K”. The city is now called Kassel.

Prussia, after the end of the 2nd World war, was held as a symbol of German militarism smashed by the victorious powers. The former Hessen-Nassau (capital Kassel) and the former Grand Duchy of Hesse (Capital Darmstadt) were restructured into a new “Great Hesse”, which from 1946 once again bore the original name “Hessen”. The province was split off from the province of "Rheinhessen". It formed the backbone for the new state of the Rhineland-Palatinate.

After almost 400 years, Kassel and Darmstadt were now part of a joint state of Hesse. However, neither of them became the capital, because the choice fell on Wiesbaden. This decision by the USA had very practical reasons, because Wiesbaden was still intact at the end of the war. This city at the foot of the Taunus had been spared during the war, because for the time after the capitulation of Germany, a suitable place was needed to set up the American headquarters. Kassel, Darmstadt and Frankfurt am Main were instead bombed at the end of the war. The fact that Darmstadt had now lost its original meaning made it easier for the inhabitants of the former Landgraviate  to give up their old animosities against the unloved southern Hesse. Darmstadt and Kassel are (besides Giessen) today the seat of government leaders with the function of Hessian district governments.